Individual results

View docs

View in-depth performance of a single language model on a single test suite.

Region-by-region surprisal
Sample item for Main-verb/Reduced-relative Garden-path Disambiguation
Item
Condition
StartNounAmbiguous verbRC contentsDisambiguatorEnd
ItemConditionStartNounAmbiguous verbRC contentsDisambiguatorEnd
1 reduced_ambig The woman brought the sandwich from the kitchen fell in the dining room
1 unreduced_ambig The woman who was brought the sandwich from the kitchen fell in the dining room
1 reduced_unambig The woman given the sandwich from the kitchen fell in the dining room
1 unreduced_unambig The woman who was given the sandwich from the kitchen fell in the dining room
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Prediction performance for JRNN on Main-verb/Reduced-relative Garden-path Disambiguation
Accuracy
Formula
Description
AccuracyPredictionDescription
75.00% reduced_ambig.Disambiguator > reduced_unambig.Disambiguator No description provided.
78.57% (reduced_ambig.Disambiguator - unreduced_ambig.Disambiguator) > (reduced_unambig.Disambiguator - unreduced_unambig.Disambiguator) We expect that the surprisal at the disambiguator in the reduced ambig minus the surprisal of the disambiguator in the unreduced ambig is less than its surprisal in the reduced un-ambig minus the unreduced un-ambig condition. This is because the disambiguator should be more surprising when the relative clause is reduced (not introduced by a “who was…” or “which was…”) and when the relative clause contains an ambiguous verb (like “brought” vs. “given”).
100.00% reduced_ambig.Disambiguator > unreduced_ambig.Disambiguator No description provided.
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries