Individual results
View docsView in-depth performance of a single language model on a single test suite.
Region-by-region surprisal
Sample item for NP/Z Garden-path Ambiguity (Overt Object)
The first item of the test suite is shown below for quick reference. Please visit the page for NP/Z Garden-path Ambiguity (Overt Object) to see the full list of items.
| Item |
Condition
|
Start | Transitive Verb | Comma | NP/Z | Verb | Continuation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Condition | Start | Transitive Verb | Comma | NP/Z | Verb | Continuation |
| 1 | no-obj_no-comma | As the criminal | shot | the woman | yelled | at the top of her lungs | |
| 1 | obj_no-comma | As the criminal | shot his gun | the woman | yelled | at the top of her lungs | |
| 1 | no-obj_comma | As the criminal | shot | , | the woman | yelled | at the top of her lungs |
| 1 | obj_comma | As the criminal | shot his gun | , | the woman | yelled | at the top of her lungs |
Prediction performance for Vanilla LSTM on NP/Z Garden-path Ambiguity (Overt Object)
| Accuracy |
Formula
|
Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Prediction | Description |
| 95.83% | (654,no-obj_no-comma/5,Verb) > (653,no-obj_comma/5,Verb) | No description provided. |
| 91.67% | (654,no-obj_no-comma/5,Verb) > (652,obj_no-comma/5,Verb) | No description provided. |
| 95.83% | ((654,no-obj_no-comma/5,Verb) - (653,no-obj_comma/5,Verb) ) > ((652,obj_no-comma/5,Verb) - (651,obj_comma/5,Verb) ) | We expect that the difference in surprisal between the Verb region in the no-obj_no-comma condition minus the no-obj_comma condition will be greater than the difference in the Verb region between the obj_comma and the no-obj_comma. This is because the comma unambiguously introduces a matrix clause. |